Thursday, April 3, 2008

Nutrient trading in PA - why it's not gangbusters

Summary of a 2/21 PA Senate Republican Policy Committe public hearing on Chesapeake Bay Tributary Strategy

Interesting meeting with testimony from PA DEP, local gov wastewater treatment plant rep's, municipalities/builders/agricultural trade org's, env org, & EPA. Here's some of the speculation for why nutrient trading isn't gangbusters:
  • it's new, it'll take time for folks to adopt (DEP)
  • vauge It's not applicable to us/ we don't feel it's a viable option at this time (local gov's)
  • no fair that sewer rate payers have to pay for nutr reductions, can we get state money for it (local gov's)
  • uncertainty of having to buy nutr credits on annual basis (price fluctuations), uncertainty of tangible result of nutr credits (local gov)
  • PT sources haven't felt the heat yet - reg's not in full force until 2010, some WWTP's haven't reached max capacity/nutrient cap yet
  • there's not enough #s of P credits avail (municipalities org)
  • nutr trading isn't financially competitive with WWTP upgrades (builders org, nutr trading co, env org)

Current price of nutr credits: $9/lb for N, $4/lb for P (Red Barn Trading Co.)

Audio of the meeting

No comments: